Smt Rutuparna Dhirsamant v. Uco Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment order in an appeal against a DRT decision. No substantive decision or reasoning provided.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Diary No. 106 of 2019)
(Arising out of S.A. 16 of 2016 in DRT, Cuttack)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
| 22.08.2022 | Rutuparna Dhirsamant … Appellant -Vs- Branch Manager, UCO Bank & 3 Others … Respondent |
|---|---|
| Mr. Gaurav Singh with Mr. Ajit Kumar Keshari, Learned Counsel for Appellant |
|
| Ms. Rituparna Sanyal, Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 1 to 3/UCO Bank |
|
| None for Respondent No. 4 |
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Affidavit-of-service filed be taken on record.
As prayed for, matter stands adjourned for the day. List on 6th September, 2022.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 22nd August, 2022 02/ac
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rutuparna Dhirsamant
- respondent
Branch Manager, UCO Bank
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court