Appellant failed to deposit required predeposit before the Debt Recovery Tribunal as ordered. Consequently, the Appellate Tribunal found the appeal not maintainable and dismissed it.
The appeal was dismissed for want of predeposit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal Diary No. 435 of 2021 (Arising out of S.A. 220 of 2019 in DRT, Visakhapatnam)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
Order No. 37 13.3.2025 M/s. Sri Prasanna Ajaneya Raw and Boiled Rice Mill … Appellant -VsState Bank of India & 2 Others … Respondents
None for Appellant
Mr. Soudip Pal Choudhuri with Ms. Saswati Sikder, Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Compliance of order dated 28.01.2025 regarding predeposit is not made. Thus, the appeal is not maintainable for want of pre-deposit.
Accordingly appeal is dismissed being not maintainable.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record room.
Order dictated and pronounced in open Court.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 13th March, 2025 07/ac
M/s. Sri Prasanna Ajaneya Raw and Boiled Rice Mill
State Bank of India
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
