Ms Sri Prasanna Anjaneya Raw and Boiled Rice Mill v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Registrar directed appellant to correct defects in appeal under DRAT within 15 days or face rejection, including missing event list and proper section.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary no.435/2021 Date: 24 /03 /2022
M/s. Sri Prasanna Anjaneya Raw and Boiled Rice Mill ..………...Appellant
Rep. by its Managing Partner Sri Garlapati Subba rao S/o. Sriramulu
Vs.
The A.O State Bank Of India & Anr ……….Respondents
Received an application under section 18Section 30 of the Recovery of debts due to banks & financial institutions Act, 1993(51 of 1993) presented by Ld. Advocate, Mr. P Sreenivas .
Scrutiny of the application reveals the followings:
The application has been filed on behalf of M/s. Sri Prasanna Anjaneya Raw and Boiled Rice Mill Rep. by its Managing Partner Sri Garlapati Subba rao S/o. Sriramulu against the order passed by the Ld. Presiding Officer, DRT-Visakhapatnam. Application fees of Rs.100405/vide T.R. no.115172 dt.09-08-2021 has been paid along with the application.
The Vakalatnama has been filed by the Ld. Advocate Mr. P Sreenivas.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. Sri Prasanna Anjaneya Raw and Boiled Rice Mill
- respondent
The A.O State Bank Of India
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court