Ms Sri Prasanna Anjaneya Raw and Boiled Rice Mill v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal listed the matter for disposal of an independent application due to a discrepancy between the Bank's submission of a settlement letter and the Appellants' denial of receiving any intimation.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Dy. No. 435 of 2021
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
22.11.2023
Ms. Sri Prasanna Anjaneya Raw and Boiled Rice Mill
... Appellants
-Vs-
State Bank of India & 2 others ……Respondents
Mr. P. Srinivas, Learned Counsel for the Appellant Mr. S. Pal Chowdhury, Learned Counsel, Ms. Saswati Sikder, Learned Counsel for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel for the Bank submitted copy of letter dated 02.06.2022 addressed to M/s Sri Prasannanjaneya Raw & Boiled Rice Mill wherein it is indicated that loan account number /CIF No.: 72050417688(AUCA A/C 40053825466) SARB Visakhapatnam has been settled. Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that the Appellants have no such intimation with them.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the dispute requires disposal of Independent Application No. 322 of 2021 given conflicting evidence regarding settlement intimation.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ms. Sri Prasanna Anjaneya Raw and Boiled Rice Mill
- respondent
State Bank of India
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court