M s S P Construction v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal reported that the appellant failed to comply with the directed pre-deposit of 30% of Rs. 2.22 crore. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the waiver application and rejected the appeal arising from the DRT order on non-compliance.
What did the court decide?
Dismissal of the waiver application (IA 971/2025) and consequent rejection of the appeal (AIR (SA) 918/2025).
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 9th of October 2025
PRESENT: Hon’ble Mr. Justice G. Chandrasekharan
CHAIRPERSON
AIR (SA) 918 OF 2025
(Arising out the order in SA 446/2024 on the file of DRT-II, Chennai
Between
- M/s.S.P. Constructions, Rep. by its Proprietor, Thomas Paulpandian, No.20 Pugalenthi Street, MGR Nagar, Chennai 600 078.
- Mr. Thomas Paulpandian, S/o Paulpandian, No. AP 1223, 77th Street, 12th Sector, K.K. Nagar, Chennai 600 078. 3. Mr. Paulpandian, S/o Selliah, No. AP 1223, 77th Street, 12th Sector, K.K. Nagar, Chennai. 600 078. ... Appellants
And
The Authorized Officer, Bank of Baroda, ROSARB Branch, Chennai Rural, No. 123, Dugar Towers, R.L. Road, Egmore, Chennai 600 008. Karumathampatti 641 659. …Respondent Counsel for Appellants : M/s. R. Thiagarajan Counsel for Respondent : M/s. S. Pandurangan
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant's failure to make the pre-deposit of 30% before the stipulated deadline results in the rejection of the appeal under the conditional order.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. S.P. Constructions, Rep. by Thomas Paulpandian
- appellant
Thomas Paulpandian
- appellant
Paulpandian
- respondent
The Authorized Officer, Bank of Baroda
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · October
- CNR
- 331090009182025
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court