M Lavanna Prop of Ms Mithil Enterprises v. Indian Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal granted permission to the appellants to withdraw their appeal. The appeal and the IA under Section 31 of the DRAT Rules were dismissed as withdrawn based on the submission that the loan was paid.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 8th of October 2025
PRESENT: Hon’ble Mr. Justice G. Chandrasekharan
CHAIRPERSON
IA 284 OF 2025 (Waiver) In AIR 1302/2024
(Arising out the order in OA NO.84 /2019 on the file of DRT-II, Chennai)
Betweem
- M. Lavanna, Proprietor of M/s. Mythil Enterprises, S/o Late. Muni Reddy, No. 22/1 Katinayakanadoddi Village, Berigai – Malur Main Road, Berigai 635 104. Also at Dorr No1/169 Mallasandiran Village, Thummanapalli Post, Hosur 635 105.
- S. Keerthi, W/o M. Lavanna, Door No.1/169 Mallasandiran Village, Thummanapalli Post, Hosur 635 105. ... Appellants
And
Indian Bank, Bangalore Road Branch, Eshwar Nagar, Bangalore Bye Pass Road, Hosur, Krishnagiri District 635 105, Rep. by its Branch Manager. …Respondents Counsel for Appellants : Mr. R. Natarajan Counsel for Respondent : Mr. T. Sundar Rajan
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M. Lavanna
- appellant
S. Keerthi
- respondent
Indian Bank
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · October
- CNR
- 331090013022024
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court