Vasantha Arumugam v. South Indian Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed as not maintainable due to non-compliance with a dated order regarding pre-deposit requirement.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
Diary No. 668 of 2022 (Arising out of O.A. 949 of 2018 in DRT-II, Hyderabad)
Order No. 16 20.6.2024 Vasantha Arumugam & Another … Appellants -VsThe South Indian Bank Limited & 4 Others … Respondents Mr. Sannidhya Dutta, Learned Counsel for Appellants
Mr. Shiv Mangal Singh with Ms. Jahan Ara Kulsum, Learned Counsel for Respondent No.1/Bank
Mr. Dhiraj Trivedi with Mr. Amit Datta, Learned Counsel for Respondent Respondents No.2 to 5
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Compliance of order dated 2nd May, 2024 regarding pre-deposit is not made. Thus, the appeal is not maintainable for want of predeposit.
Accordingly, the instant appeal, being Diary No. 668 of 2022, is dismissed being not maintainable.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Vasantha Arumugam
- respondent
The South Indian Bank Limited
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · June
- CNR
- 191090006682022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court