Vasantha Arumugam v. South Indian Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Earnest appeared for the appellants but could not receive the paper from the counterpart. Counsel is not willing to argue at the Camp Court in Hyderabad. The matter was adjourned for 13.02.2024.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA (CAMP-HYDERABAD)
(Appeal Dy.No.668 of 2022)
(Arising out of IA No.3257/2018 in OA No.949/2018 in DRT-II, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
20.12.2023
Vasantha Armugam & Anr.
… Appellants
Vs.
The South Indian Bank Ltd. & 4 Others
… Respondents
Learned Counsel for Appellants : Mr.T.S. Pushya Mitra For Mr. Pradyumma Sinha & Mr.Sannidhya Datta Respondents : Mr.K. Karunakar
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL:
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Vasantha Armugam & Anr.
- respondent
The South Indian Bank Ltd. & 4 Others
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · December
- CNR
- 191090006682022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court