Syndicate Bank v. Rahul Sharma
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellate court dismissed the appeal of Syndicate Bank as withdrawn on the submission that the parties had settled the matter and the entire amount had been deposited.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 104/2020 Date: 19.04.2024
Syndicate Bank Vs. Rahul Sharma & Anr.
Present: Shri Alok Rai, counsel for the appellant, None for the respondent nos. 1 & 2,
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the matter has been settled between the parties and entire amount has been deposited and now nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present appeal, therefore, the same may be dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the above, the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
Anupam
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Syndicate Bank
- respondent
Rahul Sharma
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · April
- CNR
- 091090001042020
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court