The appellant failed to participate in the hearing of Appeal No. 18/2022 before the DBT at Mumbai, and hence the appeal is dismissed for default at the last date of the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 18/2022
Between
Ashok Rajaram Yadav … Appellant/s V/s.
State Bank of India & Ors. …Respondent/s
Ms. Radha N., i/b M/s. The Law Point, Advocate for Respondents.
-: Order dated: 18/11/2024:-
No representation for the appellant.
On the last date of the hearing also there was no representation for the appellant.
It appears that the appellant is not keen on prosecuting this appeal.
Hence, the appeal stands dismissed for default.
Sd/Chairperson psa-09
1
Ashok Rajaram Yadav
State Bank of India & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
