The Tribunal extended the time for disposing of the S.A. from the D.R.T. from three to six months after both parties applied for an extension due to non-compliance with initial timelines.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
M.A. No.102/2024 (EoT)
In
(Misc. Appeal No.127/2023 – Disposed of)
Between
Prajakta Makarand Patil & Anr. … Appellant/s
V/s.
Encore Asset Reconstruction Co. Pvt. Ltd. Mr Alok D. Mishra, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr Rajesh Nagori along with Mr Atul Gupta, Advocates for Respondent.
-: Order dated: 14/11/2024:-
There was a direction to D.R.T.-III, Mumbai to dispose of the S.A. within three months from the date of receipt of the order of this Tribunal. It is submitted by both sides that the S.A. could not be disposed of within the time stipulated and therefore, further time is sought for disposal of the S.A. Hence, the period for the disposal of the S.A. stands extended for further three months.
nrp-25
1
Prajakta Makarand Patil & Anr.
Encore Asset Reconstruction Co. Pvt. Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
