Ashok Rajaram Yadav v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dispensed with immediate hearing as there was no urgency, ordering the matter to be listed for a future date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 18/2022
Between
Shri Ashok Rajaram Yadav … Appellant/s V/s.
State Bank of India & Ors. …Respondent/s Mr Praful Chpte, i/b Ms Tripti Nandoskar, Advocate for Appellant. Ms Heenal, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2.
-: Order dated: 08/12/2022:-
The matter has been taken up today on praecipe for an urgent hearing by the Ld. Counsel for the Appellant.
The Respondents appear.
Reply has already been filed and the matter has already been posted for hearing on 12.01.2023.
There does not seem to be urgency and hence, the matter shall be taken up for hearing on 12.01.2023.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-10
1
Shri Ashok Rajaram Yadav
State Bank of India
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court