The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal for non-compliance with the pre-deposit direction, also dismissing interlocutory applications as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson Appeal on Diary No. 1813/2024
Between
M/s Mirrikh Motors Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. … Appellant/s V/s.
Authorised Officer,
Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. …Respondent/s Mr Sachin Kaikini, i/b Ms Kanjani Trivedi, Advocate for Appellants.
-: Order dated: 14/10/2024:-
The appellants have not complied with the direction of this Tribunal by making pre-deposit as directed.
Hence, the appeal stands dismissed.
Interlocutory Applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/Chairperson
rm-9
1
M/s Mirrikh Motors Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Authorised Officer, Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
