Rupesh Pandey v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeal in I.A. No.727/2023 regarding diary appeal No.1733/2023 was dismissed for default as the court found the appellants were not keen on prosecuting it.
What did the court decide?
None. Appeal dismissed for default.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No.727/2023 (WoD)
In
Appeal on Diary No.1733/2023
Between
Rupesh Pandey & Ors. V/s.
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
… Appellant/s
…Respondent/s
Mr Sanjay Anabhawane i/b M/s. M & S Legal Ventures, Advocate for Respondent.
There is no representation for the appellants.
The application for waiver of deposit has not been heard.
It appears that the appellants are not keen on prosecuting the appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rupesh Pandey & Ors.
- respondent
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · October
- CNR
- 271090017332023
- Bench
- Ashok Menon
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court