Mr Mohd Arshad K Siddiqui v. Aditya Birla Finance Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal was disposed of as withdrawn on being settled between the parties. Interlocutory applications were dismissed as infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Appeal disposed of as withdrawn; interlocutory applications dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson Appeal on Diary No. 2058/2023 Between
Mohd. Arshad K. Siddiqui … Appellant/s V/s.
Aditya Birla Finance Ltd & Ors. …Respondent/s Advocate for the Appellant is present.
-: Order dated: 20/02/2024:-
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellant submits that a pursis is being filed today seeking permission to withdraw the appeal.
Given the fact, that the matter has been settled between the parties, the prayer is allowed and the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
Interlocutory applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/Chairperson
rm-2
1
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mohd. Arshad K. Siddiqui
- respondent
Aditya Birla Finance Ltd & Ors.
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · February
- CNR
- 271090020582023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Govinda Industries Pvt. Ltd. versus State Bank of India
Vishal Doshi and Ors. versus J. M. Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Private Limited
Mohammad Iliyas Abdul Hadi versus Sadhana Sahakari Bank Ltd.
M/s Shanti Rice Mill, through Its Prop. – Shri Vishnukumar S/O Ramvilas Modi versus State Bank of India