Mohammad Iliyas Abdul Hadi v. Sadhana Sahakari Bank Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Delhi Bench of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal by the appellants for failure to comply with the direction to make pre-deposit. Interlocutory applications were dismissed as infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for non-compliance with pre-deposit direction; interlocutory applications dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal on Diary No. 103/2024
Between
Mohammad Iliyas Abdul Hadi & Anr. V/s.
Sadhana Sahakari Bank Ltd.
… Appellant/s
…Respondent/s
An Advocate for the Appellant is present.
The Appellants have not complied with the direction of this Tribunal to make the pre-deposit.
Hence, the appeal stands dismissed.
Interlocutory Applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mohammad Iliyas Abdul Hadi & Anr.
- respondent
Sadhana Sahakari Bank Ltd.
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court