The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal allowed the withdrawal of a chamber appeal filed with a delay of over 300 days. The grant of liberty to apply afresh was declined due to the delay.
Permission to withdraw the appeal granted. Liberty to apply afresh denied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. on Diary No. 138/2024 (CoD) In
M.A. on Diary No. 137/2024 (Chamber Appeal)
In
(Appeal on Diary No. 1019/2022-Disposed of)
Between
Vishai Doshi & Anr.
… Appellant/s
V/s.
J.M. Financial Assets Reconstruction Company …Respondent/s Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Mr. Gaurang Kinkhabwala along with Khyati Bora, i/b M/s. DM Legal Ventures, Advocate for Appellants.
-: Order dated: 19/02/2024:-
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellants in this Chamber Appeal has requested permission to withdraw this appeal with the liberty to apply afresh.
This Chamber Appeal is filed with a delay of more than 300 days and therefore, the liberty cannot be granted, but permission is granted to withdraw the appeal.
The appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
Sd/Chairperson
psa-25
1
Vishai Doshi & Anr.
J.M. Financial Assets Reconstruction Company Pvt. Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
