Mr.S.Karthikeyan v. City Union Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
On compliance of partial deposit towards pre-deposit that was ordered by the Tribunal. Precapitalized appeal dismissed for non-compliance. Conditional order dated 1.11.2024 affirmed for rejection of appeal.
What did the court decide?
Rejection of the appeal for failure to deposit the required amount.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 19th day of November, 2024
PRESENT : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G. CHANDRASEKHARAN CHAIRPERSON
IA 298/2023 (Waiver) in AIR (SA) 549/2023 (Arising out of S.A.No.130/2022 On the file of DRT-II, Chennai)
Between
Mr. S. Karthikeyan, Son of Mr. Srinivasan,
No. 103/259, Sesadhri Madam Street, Tiruvannamalai – 606 601.
… Appellant
And
- The Authorised Officer, City Union Bank, ‘Narayana’, 24-B, Gandhi Nagar, Kumbakonam – 612 001.
- The Branch Manager, City Union Bank, Tiruvannamalai Branch, South Othavadi Street, Tiruvannamali – 606 601.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
S. Karthikeyan
- respondent
The Authorised Officer, City Union Bank
- respondent
The Branch Manager, City Union Bank
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 331090005492023
- Bench
- G. Chandrasekharan
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court