Disposed
Mr.S.Karthikeyan v. City Union Bank Limited
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Single-paragraph order noting the respondent bank's absence and setting the matter for an ex parte hearing on 24.11.2023 at the Chennai DRAT.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
¶2
IA 298/2023 in A.IR:549/2023
¶3
S.Karthikeyan V/S City Union Bank Ltd &Anr
¶4
29/09/2023
¶5
Vakalath of respondent bank is not filed. No representation for respondent bank today. Respondent bank is called absent and set ex parte .
¶6
At request of Ld. Counsel for petitioner/appellant, posted to 24.11.2023 for ex parte hearing.
¶7
Sd/-
¶8
Chairperson
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
S.Karthikeyan
- respondent
City Union Bank Ltd &Anr
Coram
AI extract
Chairperson
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · September
- CNR
- 331090005492023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court