Disposed
Shri Manojbhai Ramanbhai Nair v. Shri Ram City Union Finance Ltd. and Ors.
DRATIA/34/2024
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Direction to serve two weeks' notice before dispossession; post for reply/hearing on 07.03.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson I.A. No. 34/2024(Stay)
In Appeal No. 4/2024
Between
Manojbhai Ramanbhai Nair … Appellant/s V/s.
…Respondent/s
Ram City Union Finance Ltd & Ors. …Respondent/s Mr Sunil Humbre, along with Mr. Rushabh Thacker and Mr. Jeet Bhatt, i/b Mr. Rushabh Thacker, Advocate for Appellants.
Mr. Aayush Kothari, along with Ms. Shobha Chavan, i/b M/s. V. Deshpande & Co., Advocate for Respondent.
-: Order dated: 17/01/2024:-
The matter is taken up for hearing by way of a praecipe filed by Appellant for seeking urgent relief.
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Respondent seeks time to file a reply on I.A. No. 34/2024 which is an application for stay. The stay application has to be heard on merits.
It is submitted that no immediate steps have been taken by the Respondent to dispossess the Appellant.
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Respondent is directed to serve not less than two weeks' notice to the Appellant/Counsel before dispossessing him.
Post on 07.03.2024 for reply/hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
rm-6
1
Manojbhai Ramanbhai Nair
Ram City Union Finance Ltd
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court