The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Mumbai disposed of the appeal as infructuous since the subject property had already been sold.
The appeal was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson I.A. No.139/2023 (WoD)
In Appeal on Diary No.1270/2022
Between
Surya Tractors Company & Ors. … Appellant/s V/s. Bank of Baroda …Respondent/s Mr Ganesh M. Misal, Advocate for Appellants. Mr S.N. Fuladi and Mr U.N. Fuladi, Advocates for Respondent.
-: Order dated: 19/06/2024:-
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the appellants submits that the appeal has become infructuous since the subject property has already been sold.
Hence, the appeal stands disposed of as infructuous.
Sd/Chairperson
Nidhi-4
1
Surya Tractors Company & Ors.
Bank of Baroda
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
