surya tractors company v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
Unitary text insufficient (contd./picture artifacts/no substantive reasoning). Cannot determine proposition or outcome. Requires full text.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Contd Sheet
-'■t
■'i
| . Date i Office Notes, Appearances and Registrar's order / Chairperson's Orders |
|---|
■ . > • J ■, <1 . '.i f:I •r
. ‘j
A.' ■<
*8
FARAD
P-EBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL. MUMBAI
Mlsc Application No. Of 2o
In I. No.
Appeal No. Of 2o Ta - rvo- i3s/‘2023cwood
No. I21-O/22
Su*ERja TVa c Cornpony ... Appellants
(Advocatee (liflnech
£y\anii< pArscj')
Versus
Bank of Borsyoda Respondents
(Advocatee (liflnech
Parties & counsel
- appellant
SUPERJA TV AC Cornpony
- respondent
Bank of Borsyoda
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court