The Tribunal held the appeal was barred due to non-compliance with a pre-deposit direction. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
None. Appeal dismissed due to non-payment of pre-deposit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson Appeal on Diary No.705/2024
Between
Royal Traders … Appellant/s V/s.
ARCIL …Respondent/s
Mr Rohit Gupta (through video-conferencing) and Mr Umang Mehta i/b Mr Raj Dani, Advocates for Appellant.
Ms Megha Gupta (through video-conferencing) and Ms Lavanita Chityala i/b M/s. Hedgehog & Fox LLP, Advocates for Respondent.
-: Order dated: 19/06/2024:-
The appellant has not complied with the direction of this Tribunal to make the pre-deposit.
Hence, the appeal stands dismissed.
Sd/-
Chairperson
Nidhi-13
1
Royal Traders
ARCIL
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
