Appellants sought permission to withdraw an application regarding delay in restoration. The tribunal dismissed the application as it was not pressed and rejected other applications as part of the order.
Permission to withdraw application refused; application dismissed as not pressed; other applications rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 16th of December, 2024
PRESENT: Hon’ble Mr. Justice G. Chandrasekharan CHAIRPERSON
IA 526/2021 (Delay in Restoration) in AIR (SA): 76/2020 (SA 68/2019 on the file of DRT -I, Ernakulam)
Between
… Appellants
And The Authorised Officer, M/s. Indiabulls Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd., Indiabulls Finance Centre, 9th Floor, Tower – 1, Elphistone Road, Mumbai – 400 013.
… Respondent
Counsel for Appellants : Mr. Zakir Hussain Counsel for Respondent : None
1
ORDER
When the matter is taken up, Learned Counsel for Petitioners/Appellants submitted that the matter is settled between the parties and seeks permission to withdraw this Application. He has made an endorsement to that effect on the Application.
Hence, the Application in IA 526/2021 (Delay in Restn.) is dismissed as not pressed. Other Applications are stand rejected.
[Dictated to Athistamani, PS, in open court, transcribed by her, corrected and signed by me this 16th of December, 2024]
Sd/[ Justice G. Chandrasekharan] CHAIRPERSON
2
Ahamed Kunhi. K
V.H.Vaheeda
The Authorised Officer, M/s. Indiabulls Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd.
G. Chandrasekharan
As recorded by the court registry
16 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
