Vaibhav Bansal v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited and Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 546/2022 Date: 15.05.2023
Present: Shri V. K. Shukla, counsel for the appellant, Shri Shubham Shukla, Advocate holding brief of Shri Abhinav Gaur, counsel for the respondent no. 1,
The office report dated 12.05.2023 shows that no steps have been taken by the counsel for the appellant for service of notice upon the respondents no. 3, 4 & 5. As last opportunity, let the steps be taken by the appellant within a week as per earlier order dated 02.01.2023, failing which appropriate order shall be passed. Affidavit of service along with proof of publication be filed by the next date.
The aforesaid report further records that the reply has been filed on behalf of the respondent no. 1, to which no rejoinder has been filed. Let the same be filed by the next date.
List this case on 03.08.2023 for service. Till then the interim order, if any, shall remain operative.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
14 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court