Union Bank of India v. Rajendra Tosawad
Case brief
What is this about?
This order acknowledges a delay in hearing S.A. 50 of 2021 at the DRT Cuttack. The Tribunal directed the Registry to submit a report on the status of the matter and reasons for the delay, returning the matter for further orders.
What did the court decide?
Report directed from DRT Cuttack Registry regarding status of reserved order and reasons for delay; case listed for further orders.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Misc. Appeal Diary No. 587 of 2023 (Arising out of S.A. 50 of 2021 in DRT, Cuttack)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
| 04.09.2023 | Union Bank of India -Vs- Rajendra Tosawad … |
… Appellant & 3 Others Respondents |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Tuna Sahu, Lea for Appellant |
rned Counsel |
Mr. Pratap Chandra Mohapatra with Mr. Sabyasachi Mohapatra, Counsel for Respondents No. 2 to 4
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
For Admission
Heard the Learned Counsel for Appellant as well as Respondents No. 2 to 4. It is submitted that Learned DRT, Cuttack heard the matter and reserved for judgment on 11th July, 2023. Since then neither any date is fixed nor judgment is delivered.
In such circumstances, let a report be called for from the Registry, DRT Cuttack about the status of S.A. 50 of 2021 along with a copy of the order sheets from 11th July, 2023 till date. He should also submit a report as to whether after 11th July, 2023 any date was fixed with notice to the parties or not. If not, why the matter is kept undated for such a long time.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Union Bank of India
- respondent
Rajendra Tosawad
- respondent
others
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Anil Kumar Srivastava
- Order 2 · Anil Kumar Srivastava
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court