State Bank of India v. M/s S. Barman
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appl. Dy No. 307 of 2023 (Arising out of IA 112of 2021 in TRC 45 OF 2017 IN DRT Siliguri. THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
23.11.2023
State Bank of India
… Appellants Vs.
M/s. S. Barman & Co.
….. Respondents
For Appellant : Mr. Debasish Chakraborty, ld. Advocate.
For Respondents : Mr. Arik Banerjee, ld. Advocate.
Mr. Joyjit Dutta, ld. Adv. Mr. Diptesh Ghorai, ld adv.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that matter has been settled with the secured creditor, as such, he wants to withdraw the appeal. An endorsement to this effect has been made in the memo of appeal. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State Bank of India
- respondent
M/s. S. Barman & Co.
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 191090003072023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court