Appeal by State Bank of India was disposed of as dismissed due to withdrawal after settlement with the secured creditor.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appl. No. 95 of 2022 (Arising out of IA 112of 2021 in TRC 45 OF 2017 IN DRT Siliguri. THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
23.11.2023
State Bank of India
… Appellants Vs.
M/s. S. Barman & Co.
….. Respondents
For Appellant : Mr. Debasish Chakraborty, ld. Advocate.
For Respondents : Mr. Arik Banerjee, ld. Advocate.
Mr. Joyjit Dutta, ld. Adv. Mr. Diptesh Ghorai, ld adv.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that matter has been settled with the secured creditor, as such, he wants to withdraw the appeal. An endorsement to this effect has been made in the memo of appeal. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
File be consigned to record room.
Copy be also forwarded to the appellant and respondent also to the concerned DRT.
Copy of the judgement/Final Order be uploaded in the Tribunal’s website.
Order dictated, signed and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 23 day of November, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava, J) Chairperson
Dated : 23.11.2023 18 /pkb
State Bank of India
M/s. S. Barman & Co.
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
