A stay application filed during the pendency of Regular Appeal No. 333 of 2023 filed by M/s Lakshmi Agencies against an order dated 20/04/2023 passed in S.A. No. 356 of 2021 in the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Visakhapatnam.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA Regular Appeal Dy. No. 333 of 2023, Date 19/05/2023
M/s Lakshmi Agencies represented by its Proprietor Mathamsetti Madhavi & Ors. -------- Appellant
Versus
Bank of Baroda ------- Respondent
Received an appeal filed online on 18/05/2023 under section 18 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 presented by Ld. Advocate Mr. Nemani Srinivas on behalf of M/s Lakshmi Agencies represented by its Proprietor Mathamsetti Madhavi & Ors., Appellant. Hard copy of the application is received on 19/05/2023.
The appeal has been filed on behalf of M/s Lakshmi Agencies represented by its Proprietor Mathamsetti Madhavi & Ors. against the order dated 20/04/2023 passed in S.A. No. 356 of 2021 in DRT, Visakhapatnam. Appeal fee with vakalatnama fee of Rs.93005/- vide Transaction Ref. ID 1805230027839 dated 18/05/2023 has been paid through online along with the appeal.
The Vakalatnama has been filed by the Ld. Advocate.
The case is under the jurisdiction of this Appellate Tribunal.
Appeal is within the period of limitation.
Waiver application being I.A. No. 203 of 2023 is filed with application fee of Rs.200/- vide Transaction Ref. ID 1805230028270 dated 18/05/2023.
On scrutiny it is mentioned that out of four Appellants only Appellant No. 3 has signed in the Vakalatnama.
Post the matter on 06/06/2023 for removal of defect and appearance of Appellant.
Sd/-
REGISTRAR
2 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s Lakshmi Agencies represented by its Proprietor Mathamsetti Madhavi & Ors.
Bank of Baroda
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
