Sri Aneg Singh Suman and Anr. v. State Bank of India and Anr.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 769/2022 Date: 06.02.2023
Shri Aneg Singh Suman Vs. State Bank of India
Present: Shri A. K. Pal, Advocate holding brief of Shri Maneesh Mehrotra, counsel for the appellants, Shri Abhishek, Advocate holding brief of Shri P. K. Srivastava, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
As per office report dated 03.02.2023, the respondent-Bank has been noticed and the notice sent to the respondent no. 2 has returned back with no remark. No affidavit of service has been filed to authenticate the service of notice upon the other respondents.
Learned counsel for the appellant is directed to take fresh steps within 10 days for service of notice upon the unserved respondents through publication in the newspapers having wide circulation in the area. Affidavit of service along with proof of publication be filed by the next date.
A mention has been made on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellant that the arguing counsel Shri Maneesh Mehrotra could not come due to some personal difficulty, therefore, he prays for adjournment.
List this case on 01.05.2023 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Shri Aneg Singh Suman
- respondent
State Bank of India
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court