Smt K Shashikala v. Canara bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed for non-compliance with pre-deposit order. Due to failure to deposit the required amount towards the impugned order, the appeal was held not maintainable. Pending applications were disposed of accordingly.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Dy. No. 406 of 2022 (Arising out of SA No. 247 of 2018 in DRT- 1 Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
04.08.2023
K. Shashikala ... Appellants -VsCanara Bank & anr ... Respondent Ms. Sanjukta Basu Mallick, Learned Counsel for the Appellant. Ms. Aparajita Ghosh, Learned Counsel, Mr. Souvik Ghosh, Learned Counsel for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Compliance of the order dated 26.04.2023 regarding pre deposit is not made. Accordingly, Appeal is dismissed being not maintainable.
Pending I.A.s if any, are disposed of accordingly. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Copy of the order be supplied to the Appellant and the Respondent and the copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record Room.
Order dictated, signed, dated and pronounced in open Court today.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K. Shashikala
- respondent
Canara Bank
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court