Smt Ashima Ghosh v. Union Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge order listing an appeal for compliance of previous directions to implead parties and deposit costs, warning of dismissal if not complied with.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary No. 439 of 2019
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
12.05.2023 Smt. Ashima Ghosh ... Appellant -VsUnion Bank of India
... Respondent
Ms. Minakshi Majumdar with Mr. Supratick Syamal, Learned Counsel for the Appellant
Ms. Smruti Rekha Mishra, Learned Counsel for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
It appears that Appellant has not complied with the orders dated 15th February, 2023 as well as 24th April, 2023. Vide order dated 15th February, 2023 Appellant was directed to implead all the parties in this appeal who are parties in the Original Application.
On 24th April, 2023, since the order dated 15th February, 2023 was not complied, cost of Rupees ten thousand was imposed upon the Appellant.
Today when the matter is taken up, Learned Counsel for the Appellant submitted that some more time may be granted as cost is being deposited today. Matter was passed over. Again when the matter is taken up in the revised list, Learned Counsel, Ms. Minakshi Majumdar, requested that
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ashima Ghosh
- respondent
Union Bank of India
Coram
ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court