Shreoshi Dutta v. Uco Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The DRAT in Kolkata dismissed an appeal in default on 17-07-2023 as the appellant did not appear, while the respondent's counsel was present. The order was dictated and pronounced in open court.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary No. 53 of 2023 (Arising out of I.A. 1574 of 2022 in S.A. 84 of 2021 in DRT, Siliguri)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
17.07.2023 Shreoshi Dutta … Appellant -VsUCO Bank & Another … Respondents
Mr. Debanjan Chakraborty with Mr. Amit Kumar Sikhawat, Learned Counsel for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
The matter is taken up in the revised list.
None appears to represent the Appellants while Learned Counsel for Respondent is present.
Accordingly, the appeal, being Diary No. 53 of 2023, stands dismissed in default.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record room.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Shreoshi Dutta
- respondent
UCO Bank
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court