Appeal No. 41 of 2019 arising from DRT-III Kolkata stands dismissed in default as the appellant failed to appear to represent the case before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 41 of 2019 (Arising out of T.S.A. 33 of 2014 in DRT-III, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
17.07.2023 Benu Sen & Others … Appellants -VsUnited Bank of India … Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
The matter is taken up in the revised list.
None appears to represent the Appellant.
Accordingly, the appeal, being Appeal No. 41 of 2019, stands dismissed in default.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record room.
Order dictated, signed, dated and pronounced in open Court.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 17th July, 2023
14/ac
Benu Sen & Others
United Bank of India
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
