Saumik Jain v. Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The court adjourned the hearing of the appeal for personal difficulty of the arguing counsel, setting the matter for a subsequent date.
What did the court decide?
Case listed for hearing on 28.03.2023.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal in Chamber No. 01/2023 Date: 03.02.2023
Saumik Jain Vs. Bank of India
Present: Shri Varchaswa Dwivedi, Advocate holding brief of Shri Ashok Pandey, counsel for the appellant,
A mention has been made on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellant that the arguing counsel Shri Ashok Pandey could not come due to some personal difficulty, therefore, he prays for adjournment.
As prayed, list this case on 28.03.2023 for hearing.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Saumik Jain
- respondent
Bank of India
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · February
- CNR
- 091090010132022
- Bench
- Rajesh Dayal Khare
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court