Saumik Jain v. Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjudication of an application for adjournment due to counsel's unavailability; a date was fixed for the hearing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal In Chamber No. 01/2023 Date: 02.05.2023
Present: Shri Varchaswa Dwivedi, Advocate holding brief of Shri Ashok Pandey, counsel for the appellant,
A mention has been made on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellant that the arguing counsel Shri Ashok Pandey is busy before the Hon’ble High Court, therefore, he is unable to appear before this Tribunal today, hence he prays for adjournment on his behalf.
As prayed, list this case on 24.07.2023.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court