K Sai Prasad v. City Union Bank Limited
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 98 of 2022)
(Arising out of S.A. No. 75 of 2020 in DRT Visakhapatnam)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
27.03.2023
K. Sai Prasad … Appellant -VsCity Union Bank Ltd. & Ors.
Mr. N. Srinivas, Learned Counsel for the Appellant Mr. Rajiv Maity, Learned Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 & 2.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Appellant is represented through Mr. N. Srinivas, Learned Counsel. Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 are represented through Mr. Rajiv Maity, Learned Counsel. Respondent No. 3 and 4 are served through paper publication but no opposition is filed.
Respondents may file the opposition if any, within four weeks with copy to the Appellant who may file rejoinder within two weeks thereafter.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K. Sai Prasad
- respondent
City Union Bank Ltd.
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
14 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court