Trust Bank Limited v. Indian Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The single judge hearing listed two interlocutory applications (I.A. 102 and I.A. 103). No substantive decision or legal proposition was rendered. The proceedings were merely adjourned for service of documents and filing of written statements. No summary or proposition is suitable for citation.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Dy. No. 160 of 2023)
(Arising out of O.A. No. 426 of 2014 in DRT -1 Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
24.03.2023
Trust Bank Ltd. … Appellant -VsIndian Bank & 10 others ….Respondents Mr. Mridul Kanti Sasmal, Learned Counsel along with Mr. Safikul Mondal, Learned Counsel for the Appellant Mr. Debasish Chakrabarty, Learned Counsel Ms. Sarmistha Pal, Learned Counsel for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Mr. Debasish Chakrabarty, Learned Counsel has put his appearance for the Respondent No. 1. Other Respondents are proforma Respondents. Learned Counsel submits that he has not been served with the memo of Appeal. Let the same be served upon the Respondent No. 1 during the course of the day. Opposition against I.A. No. 102 of 2023 and I.A. No. 103 of 2023 be filed within two weeks with copy to the Appellant who may file rejoinder within two weeks thereafter.
List on 9th June, 2023 for disposal of I.A. No. 102 of 2023 and I.A. No. 103 of 2023.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Trust Bank Ltd.
- respondent
Indian Bank
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court