B. Bachuppa v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-page order granting respondent counsel three weeks time to file opposition in Debt Recovery Appeal No. 96 of 2023, listing for hearing on 12th December 2023.
What did the court decide?
Three weeks' time granted to respondents to file opposition.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal. No. 96 of 2023
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
01.09.2023 Banne Buchappa ... Appellants -VsState Bank of India & Ors ... Respondent Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for the Appellant. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Mukherjee, Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 Ms. Mekhala Kanji, Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 2
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Compliance of the order dated 5th July, 2023 is made by the Appellant. Learned Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 prays for and is granted three week’s time to file the opposition with copy to the Appellant who may file rejoinder within two weeks thereafter.
List on 12th December, 2023 for hearing of Appeal.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 1st September, 2023 4/tp
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Banne Buchappa
- respondent
State Bank of India
- respondent
Respondent No. 2
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
15 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court