The tribunal disposed of the miscellaneous application as not pressed by the appellant, citing that the matter between the parties was settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
M.A. No. 14 of 2020
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
01.09.2023
AO, India Infoline Finance Ltd. & Anr.
… Appellants Vs.
Tapan Kumar Sarangi
….. Respondent
For Appellant : Mr. Rajeev Maity, ld. Counsel.
For Respondents :
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that matter is settled between the parties, hence, appellant does not want to press the matter. Learned counsel has endorsed it on the memo of the miscellaneous application.
In view of the above, M.A. no. 14 of 2020 is disposed of as not pressed. No order as to costs.
File be consigned to record room.
Copy of the order be supplied to the appellant and the respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
Copy of the judgement/Final Order be uploaded in the Tribunal’s website.
Order dictated, signed and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 1st day of September, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava, J) Chairperson
Dated : 01.09.2023 10 /pkb
AO, India Infoline Finance Ltd. & Anr.
Tapan Kumar Sarangi
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
