B. Bachuppa v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Nature thin. The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal recorded the appearance of counsel and vakalat but adjourned the matter without resolving the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA (CAMP-HYDERABAD)
(Appeal Dy.No.118 of 2022)
(Arising out of S.A. No.652 of 2013 in DRT-I, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
23.06.2023
Banne Buchuppa … Appellant -VsState Bank of India & Anr. ….Respondents
Mr. Nemani Srinivas Learned Counsel for Appellant None for Respondent No.1 Mr. V. Ravinder Learned Counsel for Respondent No.2
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL:
Learned Counsel for the Appellant present. Vakalat filed by Mr. V. Ravinder, Advocate, for Respondent No.2 is taken on record. Ld. Counsel for Respondent No.1 is served with notice regarding hearing of matter at Camp Court. But none is present for Respondent No.1. List on 27.06.2023.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava, J) Chairperson
Dated 23rd June, 2023
Banne Buchuppa
State Bank of India
Anr.
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court