State Bank of India v. Ms S Barman and Co.
Case brief
What is this about?
The DRAT permitted the appellant to delete the prayer for quashing an interim order. The matter was listed for hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 95 of 2022)
(Arising out of TRC 45 of 2017 in DRT-Siliguri)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
27.09.2022
State Bank of India
… Appellant
-Vs-
M/s. S. Barman & Co.
… Respondents Mr. D. Chakraborty, ld. counsel for the appellant.
Mr. Arik Banerjee, ld. Adv. With Ms. S. Sen and Ms. Jayjit Dutta, ld. counsel for the respondent.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
At the very outset learned counsel for the appellant prays for deleting the relief for quashing the order dated 19.08.2021 from reliefs prayed for in the instant appeal. Prayer is allowed and he is permitted to do so. Appellant shall carry out necessary amendment within a week from today. Rejoinder filed by the appellant is taken on record.
List on 24.01.2023 for hearing the appeal.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 27th September, 2022 20/pkb
State Bank of India
M/s. S. Barman & Co.
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court