On 30.06.2023, the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Kolkata recorded the appellant's submission noting the respondent counsel's unavailability. The matter was listed for further hearing on 03.07.2023. No substantive decision or order was passed in this journal entry.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 93 of 2022
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
30.06.2023 State Bank of India … Appellant -VsAnji Reddy & anr … Respondent Mr. Pankaj Kumar Mukherjee, Learned Counsel for Appellant
Mr. Partho Basu, Learned Counsel for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Heard the Learned Counsel for the Appellant. It is submitted that the arguing Counsel for the Respondent is not available.
List on 3rd July, 2023 for further hearing.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 30th June, 2023 08/tp
State Bank of India
Anji Reddy & anr
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
