The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by State Bank of India as infructuous following a High Court order. No substantive order as to costs was made.
The appeal was dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appl. No. 49 of 2015
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
30.06.2023
State Bank of India
… Appellant Vs.
PGM Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
….. Respondents
For Appellant : Mr. Pankaj Kr. Mukherjee, ld. Counsel. For Respondent : Mr. P. Sreenivas, ld. Counsel for resp. no. 2 Mr. GVS Sree Ram Kumar, ld. Counsel for resp. no. 17
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Affidavit filed by the respondent no.17 is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that in view of the order passed by Hon’ble High Court at Andhra Pradesh in Writ Petition No.20875 of 2014 dated 21.09.2016, present appeal becomes infructuous . Learned counsel has endorsed the same on the memo of appeal.
Accordingly, appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
File be consigned to record room.
Copy of the order be supplied to the appellant and the respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
Copy of the judgement/Final Order be uploaded in the Tribunal’s website.
Order dictated, signed and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 30th day of June, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava, J) Chairperson
Dated : 30.06.2023 21 /pkb
State Bank of India
PGM Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd.
anil kumar srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
