State Bank of India v. Ms Abhijeet Ferrotech Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Kolkata listed the appeal for further hearing as the hearing could not be concluded due to the respondent's absence or inability to conclude arguments. The matter was adjourned.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 81 of 2022
(Arising out of TA 179 of 2020 in DRT- 2 Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
01.02.2023
State Bank of India
… Appellant -VsM/s. Abhijeet Ferrotech Ltd., … Respondents
Mr. S. Ganguly, ld. Counsel with Mr. Kouchik Bhatta and MR. S. Sinha, ld. Counsel for the appellant. Mr. Jishnu Chowdhury, ld. Counsel with Ms. D. Lahiri and Ms. M. Sharma, ld. counsel for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
The matter is taken up for hearing. Mr. Jishnu Chowdhury, ld. Counsel for the appellant made submission at length and concluded his argument. Mr. Souritra Ganguly, ld. Counsel for
the respondent argued which could not be concluded.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State Bank of India
- respondent
M/s. Abhijeet Ferrotech Ltd.
Coram
ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
18 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court