Union Bank of India v. Sonovision Entp
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
s IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 78 of 2019)
(Arising out of S.A. No.106 of 2016 in DRT-Visakhapatnam)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
03.02.2023 Authorised Officer Union Bank of India … Appellant -VsM/s Sonovision enterprises ….Respondents Mr. S. Pal Chowdhury, Learned Counsel Ms. Saswati Sikder, Learned Counsel for the Appellant Mr. N. Srinivas, Learned Counsel for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel for the Appellant prays for time to reply the specific order dated 23rd August, 2022.
List on 23rd March, 2023. It is made clear that the query should be replied positively either in affirmative or in negative. If it is not done, then the Authorised Officer shall be summoned in Court. Reply should be filed through a personal affidavit of the concerned Authorised officer.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Union Bank of India
- respondent
M/s Sonovision enterprises
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court