Union Bank of India v. Sonovision Entp
Case brief
What is this about?
This order lists the matter on April 19, 2022. It grants the appellant bank two weeks to file a counter affidavit and warns of a rejoinder.
What did the court decide?
Two weeks' time granted to Appellant Bank to file counter affidavit.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 78 of 2019) (Arising out of S.A. 106 of 2018 in DRT, Visakhapatnam)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
24.03.2022 Authorised Officer-cum-Chief Manager, Union Bank of India … Appellant Vs. Sonovision Enterprises … Respondent
Mr. Soudip Pal Choudhuri with Ms. Saswati Sikdar, Learned Counsel for Appellant Bank
Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Affidavit-in-opposition, filed by Respondents, be taken on record.
Learned Counsel for Appellant Bank prays for, and is granted, two weeks’ time to file counter affidavit; advance copy whereof be supplied to Respondents; rejoinder, if any, be filed by the next date with advance copy to the Appellant Bank.
List the matter on 19th April, 2022 for hearing.
Sd/(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Union Bank of India
- respondent
Sonovision Enterprises
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court