Deepak Harkishandas Mirchandani v. the D C B Bank Ltd.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 67/2016
Deepak Harkishandas Mirchandani Appellant/s
V/s.
The DCB Bank Ltd. & Ors.
…Respondent/s
An advocate for the Appellant is present.
Ms Meenu P., i/b M/s. M. V. Kini & Co., Advocate for Respondent Bank.
The Respondent Bank has assigned the debt to an ARC and it is submitted that the Appellants may have to take steps for substituting the first Respondent.
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Respondent submits that they do not intend to bring the Assignee on record. Hence, the Assignee may take steps to bring themselves on the party array as interested party Respondent in this appeal.
Adjourned to 24.11.2023 for steps.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Deepak Harkishandas Mirchandani
- respondent
The DCB Bank Ltd.
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court