T. Mahindra Choudhury v. Uco Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The order lists Appeal No. 59 of 2022 for hearing along with Appeal No. 55 of 2022. Counsel for Respondent No. 1 stated no opposition would be filed. No decision or substantive adjudication is recorded in this text.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 59 of 2022
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
09.10.2023 Tripuraneni Mahidhar Chowdhary & Another .. Appellants -VsUCO Bank & Another .. Respondents Mr. Pratyush Patwari, Learned Counsel for the Appellant Ms. Rituparna Sanyal, Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 1/ Bank Mr. R. Padmanabha Raju, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 2
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Counsel for Respondent No. 1 submits that she will not file any opposition in this appeal.
List on 30th January, 2024 for hearing of appeal along with Appeal No. 55 of 2022.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 09th October, 2023 11/ac
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Tripuraneni Mahidhar Chowdhary & Another
- respondent
UCO Bank & Another
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court