Ajitsinh Khumansinh Sisodia v. Bank of India
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Contd Sheet
| . Date | Office Notes, Appearances and Registrar’s order / Chairperson's Orders |
|---|---|
| 1_1_ | |
| / | |
| ? > 1 I 3 > ’’ |
FARAD
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
MUMBAI
Mlsc Application No. of20
In------- ------ I. No.
Appeal No. ■ . of 20
ON (NO- gSG/ZZOO.3
Rj V< u mo.'&S \ hA Scd {a
Appellants
(Advocate-, Aeev py> g}-V •
J
Versus
Qar>V< OP ZE nd io (^ns Respondents
(Advocate.
J
Date Office Notes, Appearances
_______ and Registrar’s order/ Chairperson’s Orders
RdM, HumVaz V<V\c\r> Ptnr App-dtanv- .
Adv- Pa^cvyi Gharri foTT Resp- No* I
Pdv . Dha?rmer\dTr(i 'Tit^aTT’i P^-tT Pesp.rxio.
Adi ■ fb'u" Goropliance *2-Q-/os/^o^23
TZ /c- Pegishzr^rzr
2-^/03/2-3
Due to administrative reason,
board discharged. 1 ^/M /
\tx/11/20;23 rvo^e FdtT AppellarxA- •
RcK/ - P75UjaJr<'b3 Ftxzt Pd
Rclv *0 ha-zrrrxerd^M TJ rb^ '
aAv . ftns- TreSponJente sed< ifi^PePly •
p4j ; ft.'Q- Ce>rv'f>li'ance / Reply Og/bl /QaQq .
^ZTI C^'Gg fe'Vazt'3'
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court